Guardian Compliance
From paper records to 950 live sites.
950
sites live as of
35%
of the sites in the market
- Problem
- Paper or legacy records, no cross-venue trail
- Move
- One customer record across venues
- Role
- End-to-end product managerMerkur account owner
- Timeline
- Aug 2024 to 19 Oct 2026
Venue by venue to one record
The question: what do staff on the floor need to notice someone in trouble, and what does a compliance team need to show they acted?
Click through it
Hit play, then click the pulsing dot.
Guardian Compliance click-through
Sanitised wireframes, fictional data
add: the real click-through goes here
Three decisions
Play with the first. Tap boxes on the others.
Prompt people, don’t decide for them
Operators set the lines. Staff get the prompt. Configurable rules, not AI.
- Alert
- Staff prompted
- Interaction logged
Fictional data, not the Guardian UI. Dark lines are the operator’s thresholds.
add: why rules were right hereadd: how loose settings are guarded
Through the trade body
The route to market was our MD’s call. I owned the Merkur account.
Swipe the diagram →
Tap a box.
add: my part in the rolloutadd: what changed because of Merkuradd: how many of ~700 are live
Build to rollout, to scale
Drawn to scale: 26 months from first build to 950 live sites.
Swipe the diagram →
add: sites live at each stage
One operator’s inspection
Anonymised.
- Special measures
- Rolled out Guardian
- Cleared
Tap a step.
sensitive: check wording against the Commission’s guidance and RBW, or cut
Next
add: what I’d change, and what’s next for the product
Next case study
RBW Atlas: one system of record, and an agent that knows when to ask a person
Read it